Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-29 01:53:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF39BC41EB5456A8DC7ADDF5A8C4B7FB76119DD87D7E22449DBEDFABF903EE15
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an example of "cherry picking". There may be other groups with an increased willingness to see their candidate cheat, but the linked article presents a narrowly-defined demographic as the only such group. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784472131411292276
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF39BC41EB5456A8DC7ADDF5A8C4B7FB76119DD87D7E22449DBEDFABF903EE15
  • createdAtMillis - 1714355606343
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1784472131411292276BF39BC41EB5456A8DC7ADDF5A8C4B7FB76119DD87D7E22449DBEDFABF903EE15