Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-28 02:28:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C74489302A41E4E4AEF3B6FA6D0BE8538BBE325BC561E54938F54B93EB05D993
Participant Details

Original Note:

原発の安全性につての自説開示は自身のリプライによって行えば事足りることであって、匿名のノートによって客観性を装うことはコミュニティノートの趣旨に反する

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784401478742090091
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C74489302A41E4E4AEF3B6FA6D0BE8538BBE325BC561E54938F54B93EB05D993
  • createdAtMillis - 1714271328437
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1784401478742090091C74489302A41E4E4AEF3B6FA6D0BE8538BBE325BC561E54938F54B93EB05D993