Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-27 22:26:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF6FF1BB1FCA6DF75FD29164B9CAD9FA063A7CFEECE4B79FC29E4995CA428E29
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP is bringing back up accusations that were already found to be untrue in the court of law back in 2015. https://twitter.com/vvr9Xcdu9D0lvTv/status/1784306772163113125?t=JF07_qmEPwk0-ewhSph7Bg&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784334814486704472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF6FF1BB1FCA6DF75FD29164B9CAD9FA063A7CFEECE4B79FC29E4995CA428E29
  • createdAtMillis - 1714256801423
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1784334814486704472EF6FF1BB1FCA6DF75FD29164B9CAD9FA063A7CFEECE4B79FC29E4995CA428E29