Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-28 03:12:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBB3CC60D12479CBC4FB1EC61AC95ADC49ADDC70BE30F74B4D1A3CEFE39CD6ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The included source says exactly that this amount of ink is harmless, thus the link does not reinforce the note, and no note is needed. You shoud read the article before mentioning it as support for your argument, what a shame

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784288691344601253
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBB3CC60D12479CBC4FB1EC61AC95ADC49ADDC70BE30F74B4D1A3CEFE39CD6ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1714273973505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1784288691344601253DBB3CC60D12479CBC4FB1EC61AC95ADC49ADDC70BE30F74B4D1A3CEFE39CD6ED