Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-27 22:41:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFAA0A993B9E4FCEABEF76B4D3567913AF4EE98B1E6611847E7B83F04614A2CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The included source says exactly that this amount of ink is harmless, thus the link does not reinforce the note, and no note is needed. You shoud read the article before mentioning it as support for your argument, what a shame

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784288691344601253
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFAA0A993B9E4FCEABEF76B4D3567913AF4EE98B1E6611847E7B83F04614A2CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1714257702411
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1784288691344601253CFAA0A993B9E4FCEABEF76B4D3567913AF4EE98B1E6611847E7B83F04614A2CF