Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-27 20:26:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7648FA748917E89059A5AB7C89D5C0509CBC72C781432C3E5AEB164E9B5C402B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The included source says exactly that this amount of ink is harmless, thus the link does not reinforce the note, and no note is needed. You shoud read the article before mentioning it as support for your argument, what a shame

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784288691344601253
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7648FA748917E89059A5AB7C89D5C0509CBC72C781432C3E5AEB164E9B5C402B
  • createdAtMillis - 1714249601679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17842886913446012537648FA748917E89059A5AB7C89D5C0509CBC72C781432C3E5AEB164E9B5C402B