Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 01:15:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5E2DE780960E52AF20BFD08504E38ADB8D58DEE60B4D94B052862E933C976AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Suggested note’s reading of the ICJ ruling is incorrect. Their own source is saying a ruling on genocide has not yet been made, not that the ICJ ruled there was no plausible case for genocide.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784279334284611878
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5E2DE780960E52AF20BFD08504E38ADB8D58DEE60B4D94B052862E933C976AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1714785301438
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1784279334284611878B5E2DE780960E52AF20BFD08504E38ADB8D58DEE60B4D94B052862E933C976AB