Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-27 11:33:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AFAE1E2FB539BE1AF5B049CE780070858CCC030CE02C3C8D81DD8EDDB93114C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the methodology is avaliable in the full paper and meets the standards of a systematic review

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784131923649933316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AFAE1E2FB539BE1AF5B049CE780070858CCC030CE02C3C8D81DD8EDDB93114C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1714217593027
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1784131923649933316AFAE1E2FB539BE1AF5B049CE780070858CCC030CE02C3C8D81DD8EDDB93114C0