Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-29 06:41:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9574D986BD0DA7727A271EA800BDBA33E723B8BD7B88C8DD09580C7BEF23F832
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the methodology is avaliable in the full paper and meets the standards of a systematic review

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784131923649933316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9574D986BD0DA7727A271EA800BDBA33E723B8BD7B88C8DD09580C7BEF23F832
  • createdAtMillis - 1714372861680
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17841319236499333169574D986BD0DA7727A271EA800BDBA33E723B8BD7B88C8DD09580C7BEF23F832