Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-27 11:33:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AFAE1E2FB539BE1AF5B049CE780070858CCC030CE02C3C8D81DD8EDDB93114C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This review incorrectly labels itself as a "systematic review" when it is actually a narrative review. Systematic reviews must follow a strict protocol and comprehensively evaluate and grade all available evidence. This review merely reports the findings of various studies. https://www.cochrane.org/news/video-what-are-systematic-reviews https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1784034164448080364
participantId -
raterParticipantId - AFAE1E2FB539BE1AF5B049CE780070858CCC030CE02C3C8D81DD8EDDB93114C0
createdAtMillis - 1714217588263
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1784034164448080364AFAE1E2FB539BE1AF5B049CE780070858CCC030CE02C3C8D81DD8EDDB93114C0