Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-28 14:50:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58A2D513949A558E11D6CFBBC037621CBE74DF90556FE93FBEB45FD6A0E0AE64
Participant Details

Original Note:

The figure of merit considered - the % performance compared to humans - for the mentioned types of tasks implies a mathematical ceiling for the figure of merit, not much bigger than 100% https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784033460492882067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58A2D513949A558E11D6CFBBC037621CBE74DF90556FE93FBEB45FD6A0E0AE64
  • createdAtMillis - 1714315827109
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178403346049288206758A2D513949A558E11D6CFBBC037621CBE74DF90556FE93FBEB45FD6A0E0AE64