Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-26 21:59:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0C62778C39AA1C735804FDCB0038BACB351FE20B9671A92E87B17DB5E3C2740
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Note claiming that this post is “False” & the “ICJ has ruled there is no indication of genocide” is factually incorrect. The quoted text is NOT the primary ruling from the court. It is from a *separate opinion* from one of only *2* judges that dissented from the other *15* https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203454

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783972904331624623
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0C62778C39AA1C735804FDCB0038BACB351FE20B9671A92E87B17DB5E3C2740
  • createdAtMillis - 1714168755123
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1783972904331624623C0C62778C39AA1C735804FDCB0038BACB351FE20B9671A92E87B17DB5E3C2740