Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-26 22:51:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Note claiming that this post is “False” & the “ICJ has ruled there is no indication of genocide” is factually incorrect. The quoted text is NOT the primary ruling from the court. It is from a *separate opinion* from one of only *2* judges that dissented from the other *15* https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203454

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783972904331624623
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A
  • createdAtMillis - 1714171861295
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17839729043316246239E93A0C21A1CD3DD7C3A772E71A2DD0B6E79103B020A32F103E816535094229A