Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-26 22:04:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C2ACAA5FB33EE652DD2D712C1A1F51FC4E63138DFC04994360DA8B721FED492
Participant Details

Original Note:

Enthoven n'est pas une source sérieuse sur la question et peut même être jugé partial, veuillez reprendre des travaux de la CIJ ou de spécialistes du droit international pour annoter le tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783943924689633381
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C2ACAA5FB33EE652DD2D712C1A1F51FC4E63138DFC04994360DA8B721FED492
  • createdAtMillis - 1714169095577
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17839439246896333814C2ACAA5FB33EE652DD2D712C1A1F51FC4E63138DFC04994360DA8B721FED492