Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-27 11:41:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C17B1152BCDE80B83C08FA672776DE58C2F6C458E2F1C0D728D1B404BB3C703C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post has no evidence whatsoever and the author of this post doesn’t quote the “source” that supports the rumor that pretends to establish as fact. Unless someone presents enough arguments to hold this premise, this post is an attempt of fallacy. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/portuguese-english/falacia

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783942699533451270
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C17B1152BCDE80B83C08FA672776DE58C2F6C458E2F1C0D728D1B404BB3C703C
  • createdAtMillis - 1714218078809
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1783942699533451270C17B1152BCDE80B83C08FA672776DE58C2F6C458E2F1C0D728D1B404BB3C703C