Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 14:11:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2194DFA776AC650618C85275E1ED6FCA0574466AD8A1D62CA8CBC13F28DA92CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

According to the Supreme Court's docket in this case, the "question presented" is "Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office." https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-939.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783852525021540463
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2194DFA776AC650618C85275E1ED6FCA0574466AD8A1D62CA8CBC13F28DA92CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1714486315071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17838525250215404632194DFA776AC650618C85275E1ED6FCA0574466AD8A1D62CA8CBC13F28DA92CE