Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 14:35:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E7EC9EF9C1281A9A932F4BCD0604E490E155AA63F6EB7C36509C5926EDB1DAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

According to the Supreme Court's docket in this case, the "question presented" is "Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office." https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-939.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1783852525021540463
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0E7EC9EF9C1281A9A932F4BCD0604E490E155AA63F6EB7C36509C5926EDB1DAE
createdAtMillis - 1714487716272
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17838525250215404630E7EC9EF9C1281A9A932F4BCD0604E490E155AA63F6EB7C36509C5926EDB1DAE