Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-26 08:56:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78E2E55932E1805336D697C9E33BD153810049A62419B8EFCE32DD24D77E3515
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: those discussions could be had in the comments. do a retweet or something. they author even links the papers they are basing their opinions on, and responding to it as a community note is abuse of power.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783776104341295178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78E2E55932E1805336D697C9E33BD153810049A62419B8EFCE32DD24D77E3515
  • createdAtMillis - 1714121803779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178377610434129517878E2E55932E1805336D697C9E33BD153810049A62419B8EFCE32DD24D77E3515