Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-26 18:42:47 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 65F788985DB5E6D5AD3C1B0C39657BFDFE8725F410A604FBFEF44E2000C8F7A1
Participant Details
Original Note:
While the NYT is correct in highlighting the importance of a free, independent and rigorous press, it fails to mention that in the past few months, numerous accusations of partisan reporting and journalistic dishonesty have been levied against them. https://theintercept.com/2024/01/09/newspapers-israel-palestine-bias-new-york-times/ https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way https://jacobin.com/2024/02/new-york-times-anti-palestinian-bias https://thegrayzone.com/2024/01/10/questions-nyt-hamas-rape-report/ https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/ https://theintercept.com/2024/03/04/nyt-october-7-sexual-violence-kibbutz-beeri/ https://theintercept.com/2024/04/15/nyt-israel-gaza-genocide-palestine-coverage/ https://apnews.com/article/new-york-times-protest-gaza-ceasefire-c1482efbb3f767a0898a3d20f9647bc2 https://mondoweiss.net/2023/11/the-nytimes-continues-to-slander-and-silence-students-for-justice-in-palestine-and-jewish-voice-for-peace/ https://truthout.org/articles/leaked-document-shows-nyt-censorship-of-words-like-genocide-in-gaza-coverage/
All Note Details