Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-26 13:21:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CACE26CC9CFFE9F8333750E0A2732DD5FAF3473A196F8E174DFDD496FCF45AA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the post makes no factual statement or claim that could mislead people, and instead asks users to consider a certain perspective. The source cited in the proposed note are known to spread disinformation and propaganda. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-03-03/xinhua-china-propaganda

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783633604506968514
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CACE26CC9CFFE9F8333750E0A2732DD5FAF3473A196F8E174DFDD496FCF45AA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1714137694377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1783633604506968514CACE26CC9CFFE9F8333750E0A2732DD5FAF3473A196F8E174DFDD496FCF45AA6