Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 20:15:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6F53F1C80B04DEAC9AAEB778118DBEFF16AFE0043EB317D1DFE4B556CE3DA5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the complete opposite of the truth. The judge ruled that Fox had libelled his victims by calling them paedophiles. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/laurence-fox-libel-cases-damages-high-court-paedophile-b1153839.html She added that it would be “extremely long odds” for the tweets calling Fox a racist to have caused the current state of his acting career.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783559942844174432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6F53F1C80B04DEAC9AAEB778118DBEFF16AFE0043EB317D1DFE4B556CE3DA5B
  • createdAtMillis - 1714076103409
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1783559942844174432F6F53F1C80B04DEAC9AAEB778118DBEFF16AFE0043EB317D1DFE4B556CE3DA5B