Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 22:08:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the complete opposite of the truth. The judge ruled that Fox had libelled his victims by calling them paedophiles. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/laurence-fox-libel-cases-damages-high-court-paedophile-b1153839.html She added that it would be “extremely long odds” for the tweets calling Fox a racist to have caused the current state of his acting career.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783559942844174432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F
  • createdAtMillis - 1714082901257
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1783559942844174432C818901FAF1FB802E7B588D62CFF8FE90A9E0939B7C7638F28628C815A2E800F