Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-26 04:09:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E43AE73D2A864D2CD29BD1182626599C486BD0E913EA81A59D1C131B03580C9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Since this was a libel case, claimants did not need to prove that they had suffered any loss. https://www.humphreys.co.uk/articles/defamation-elements-of-a-claim/#:~:text=In%20libel%20claims%2C%20the%20claimant,proved%20in%20claims%20for%20slander.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783545890357035209
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E43AE73D2A864D2CD29BD1182626599C486BD0E913EA81A59D1C131B03580C9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1714104564567
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1783545890357035209E43AE73D2A864D2CD29BD1182626599C486BD0E913EA81A59D1C131B03580C9E