Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 20:18:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57D200CCB5973800C1CCEB81EB4BB33E68B104335CF3BD56CA5495A497688DC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Since this was a libel case, claimants did not need to prove that they had suffered any loss. https://www.humphreys.co.uk/articles/defamation-elements-of-a-claim/#:~:text=In%20libel%20claims%2C%20the%20claimant,proved%20in%20claims%20for%20slander.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783545890357035209
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57D200CCB5973800C1CCEB81EB4BB33E68B104335CF3BD56CA5495A497688DC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1714076299427
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178354589035703520957D200CCB5973800C1CCEB81EB4BB33E68B104335CF3BD56CA5495A497688DC2