Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 16:25:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B83E02D602A269485C06A3996853755E1FC63DFFB64C82398445C0AD423AACF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

記事タイトルがわかりにくいため情報を補足します。 吉村知事持論、ドメイン投票方式です。実際には、子どもの保護者が投票し、未来に余命が長いほど手厚い意思決定機関を構築する試みです。 更に合わせて平均余命に応じて議席配分を行い未来思考の意思決定機関を構築する試みもあります。 https://www.nira.or.jp/paper/article/2012/mg36.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783512597406638378
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B83E02D602A269485C06A3996853755E1FC63DFFB64C82398445C0AD423AACF5
  • createdAtMillis - 1714062322331
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1783512597406638378B83E02D602A269485C06A3996853755E1FC63DFFB64C82398445C0AD423AACF5