Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-26 02:52:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96B4E87C27510D927BC5CBAC67B64F296E23D3B4DF1CF5DA7E33D6BF5DAA6299
Participant Details

Original Note:

タイトルがわかりにくいため情報を補足します。 吉村知事持論、ドメイン投票方式です。実際には、子どもの保護者が投票し、未来に余命が長いほど手厚い意思決定機関を構築する試みです。 更に合わせて平均余命に応じて議席配分を行い未来思考の意思決定機関を構築する試みもあります。 https://www.nira.or.jp/paper/article/2012/mg36.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783512222339391996
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96B4E87C27510D927BC5CBAC67B64F296E23D3B4DF1CF5DA7E33D6BF5DAA6299
  • createdAtMillis - 1714099933317
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178351222233939199696B4E87C27510D927BC5CBAC67B64F296E23D3B4DF1CF5DA7E33D6BF5DAA6299