Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 10:06:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA5D81AB9576DD1BE37FFDC375F33C8E1BFFD59022966C961CBEC00037EAE00D
Participant Details

Original Note:

It’s a non-peer-reviewed paper that repeats Angstrom's laboratory mistake about saturation from more than 100 years ago history.aip.org/climate/co2.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783359561463898120
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA5D81AB9576DD1BE37FFDC375F33C8E1BFFD59022966C961CBEC00037EAE00D
  • createdAtMillis - 1714039570256
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1783359561463898120AA5D81AB9576DD1BE37FFDC375F33C8E1BFFD59022966C961CBEC00037EAE00D