Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 10:02:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16F23AFA19285D46E7619B03F0113DCEB00DA79D1484F859157F0F11EC87820C
Participant Details

Original Note:

A manchete não representa o resultado do estudo, que foi que ambos os lados da discussão (e não apenas um, como sugerido) tiveram percentual significativo de supostos robôs. Como contexto, a autora do estudo defendeu o polêmico PL das Fake News, e portanto não é imparcial. https://oglobo.globo.com/google/amp/politica/noticia/2023/04/e-preciso-ter-transparencia-completa-da-publicidade-nas-redes-sociais-diz-pesquisadora.ghtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783307000387874958
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16F23AFA19285D46E7619B03F0113DCEB00DA79D1484F859157F0F11EC87820C
  • createdAtMillis - 1714039351049
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178330700038787495816F23AFA19285D46E7619B03F0113DCEB00DA79D1484F859157F0F11EC87820C