Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 11:49:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF6F0F238357A426CF1680B715A4234C9E0D2B3FCBBB1B797E946CA5C31B9F1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

If you are going to argue about the legitimacy of the email, please take it to the comment section. You have offered no factual counterclaim, just poorly-articulated speculation. The email was clearly edited to remove personal details about the sender.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783209615175393559
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF6F0F238357A426CF1680B715A4234C9E0D2B3FCBBB1B797E946CA5C31B9F1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1714045794089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1783209615175393559CF6F0F238357A426CF1680B715A4234C9E0D2B3FCBBB1B797E946CA5C31B9F1C