Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 10:05:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unbelegte These. Die genannten Videos haben inzwischen sogar teils höhere Aufrufzahlen als die meisten seiner anderen Posts. Das erste zu dem Fall hat z.B. 31.800 Aufrufe, Stand Mittwochnachmittag. Die Behauptung, die Beiträge würden gedrosselt, kann also nicht stimmen. Siehe: https://www.tiktok.com/@anwaltjun

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783110194035150932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71
  • createdAtMillis - 1714039530852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1783110194035150932A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71