Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-24 11:38:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFC189B52A28A4461C92950CAAB7EA4FB2BB57F626CFC1E66C7547F64473AAA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Current note misleading. Systematic reviews featured in Cass did not use GRADE but the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale[1], a change from plan in preregistration where MMAT was indicated[2]. Very existence of the note suggests confusion and lack of clarity on this point. [1] https://adc.bmj.com/content/early/2024/04/09/archdischild-2023-326669 [2] https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=289659

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1783051428824576169
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EFC189B52A28A4461C92950CAAB7EA4FB2BB57F626CFC1E66C7547F64473AAA3
createdAtMillis - 1713958720014
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1783051428824576169EFC189B52A28A4461C92950CAAB7EA4FB2BB57F626CFC1E66C7547F64473AAA3