Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-24 04:05:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00AEE4BC019ADCFA50915C9329994BF6243FE0FEBC2EF5F2114F7BFFA6F7F3BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

以下の元記事を読まずに誤解をしており、批判先導になりえる投稿です。 遺族年金の廃止の検討ではなく、 現在受給要件に男女差があるため、それを是正しようという検討が主になります。 https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20230728/k10014145971000.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782975251275731044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00AEE4BC019ADCFA50915C9329994BF6243FE0FEBC2EF5F2114F7BFFA6F7F3BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1713931538178
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178297525127573104400AEE4BC019ADCFA50915C9329994BF6243FE0FEBC2EF5F2114F7BFFA6F7F3BD