Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-24 02:42:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EE85F72355851C87FDDE84506361E48C52AAB618F239EC99E1F5839BA5B0BF4
Participant Details

Original Note:

簡裁または地裁から控訴して高裁で0対100の過失割合が出ている物と思われますが、日本の裁判は三審制であり最高裁に上告し判決が覆る可能性がゼロではないため判決は確定らしいとのポストは誤りです。 https://www.courts.go.jp/about/sosiki/gaiyo/index.html#:~:text=%E6%88%91%E3%81%8C%E5%9B%BD%E3%81%AF%EF%BC%8C%E6%AD%A3%E3%81%97%E3%81%84%E8%A3%81%E5%88%A4%E3%82%92,%E3%82%92%E6%8E%A1%E7%94%A8%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%81%BE%E3%81%99%E3%80%82 下記のポストでは断言している為認識が完全に誤っています https://twitter.com/GRSuprq/status/1782770533001564252

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782951465327419629
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EE85F72355851C87FDDE84506361E48C52AAB618F239EC99E1F5839BA5B0BF4
  • createdAtMillis - 1713926533137
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17829514653274196291EE85F72355851C87FDDE84506361E48C52AAB618F239EC99E1F5839BA5B0BF4