Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-24 03:40:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FC02CAC9FD1D0CB720EF0162221E8D0D45EBE16C7B97E20E9C39F410C9F0B0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is unverified and has been convincingly challenged by a group of open source analysts who specialize in such claims https://twitter.com/GeoConfirmed/status/1782360892249612466

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782895731231064107
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FC02CAC9FD1D0CB720EF0162221E8D0D45EBE16C7B97E20E9C39F410C9F0B0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713930007765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17828957312310641079FC02CAC9FD1D0CB720EF0162221E8D0D45EBE16C7B97E20E9C39F410C9F0B0F