Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 00:26:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11691B6E60A3A488F332DD35C0E384AC5C894F035C3C8757E0C663D22452E2A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is unverified and has been convincingly challenged by a group of open source analysts who specialize in such claims https://twitter.com/GeoConfirmed/status/1782360892249612466

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782893467351330892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11691B6E60A3A488F332DD35C0E384AC5C894F035C3C8757E0C663D22452E2A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1714004805214
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178289346735133089211691B6E60A3A488F332DD35C0E384AC5C894F035C3C8757E0C663D22452E2A5