Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-24 11:53:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E12B72F60C1C77ABBF60F1A8D1EAB59466C1752199834FB79CBFA6650E0CA6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is unverified and has been convincingly challenged by a group of open source analysts who specialize in such claims https://twitter.com/GeoConfirmed/status/1782360892249612466

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782893467351330892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E12B72F60C1C77ABBF60F1A8D1EAB59466C1752199834FB79CBFA6650E0CA6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1713959615370
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17828934673513308920E12B72F60C1C77ABBF60F1A8D1EAB59466C1752199834FB79CBFA6650E0CA6E