Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-24 02:11:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB9F8A76F30436AAC1FB5C6BF94575C05646EA7475D0C487FF6A95D2A177FA5C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is unverified and has been convincingly challenged by a group fo open source analysts who specialize in such claims https://twitter.com/GeoConfirmed/status/1782360891624665180?t=RQkSnTG_uCyy1LBB1lZf6w&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782879277865689129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB9F8A76F30436AAC1FB5C6BF94575C05646EA7475D0C487FF6A95D2A177FA5C
  • createdAtMillis - 1713924709606
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782879277865689129EB9F8A76F30436AAC1FB5C6BF94575C05646EA7475D0C487FF6A95D2A177FA5C