Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 14:30:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 874E3E6CDA00E3CCD7D9C804AF565C3A50EFC9A2571B2EE4CACADE4C04D09768
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿は裁判に勝訴したという事実を報告したに過ぎず、ワクチンの有効性については一言も言及していないため、ワクチンの有効性についてのコミュニティノートは投稿とは無関係であり不要である。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782754975598448899
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 874E3E6CDA00E3CCD7D9C804AF565C3A50EFC9A2571B2EE4CACADE4C04D09768
  • createdAtMillis - 1713882617498
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782754975598448899874E3E6CDA00E3CCD7D9C804AF565C3A50EFC9A2571B2EE4CACADE4C04D09768