Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 09:01:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post is not misleading. X has complied, pending appeal, with the eSafety Commissioner's demand to censor the video within Australia's borders. Reducing the visibility of, obscuring, or outright removing content is, by definition, censorship of the content.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782618526357872986
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1713862871623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17826185263578729863EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC