Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 15:05:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD385D7D7A8CC95B3BDED3ACE0C0BF7E77805A3542E30F961A06782BF0949004
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case involves a city that tried to fine people for sleeping outside when they were otherwise offered shelter in one of the cities' shelters. The case is not about deciding whether cities can ban people from sleeping outside when no other alternatives are available. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-175

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782579861925814413
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD385D7D7A8CC95B3BDED3ACE0C0BF7E77805A3542E30F961A06782BF0949004
  • createdAtMillis - 1713884736570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782579861925814413CD385D7D7A8CC95B3BDED3ACE0C0BF7E77805A3542E30F961A06782BF0949004