Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 02:58:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 084AE681D7FA3FEC4C8B79490CE81813D6953B64171BFAE025731C560ED0D988
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case involves a city that tried to fine people for sleeping outside when they were otherwise offered shelter in one of the cities' shelters. The case is not about deciding whether cities can ban people from sleeping outside when no other alternatives are available. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-175

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782579861925814413
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 084AE681D7FA3FEC4C8B79490CE81813D6953B64171BFAE025731C560ED0D988
  • createdAtMillis - 1713841114394
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782579861925814413084AE681D7FA3FEC4C8B79490CE81813D6953B64171BFAE025731C560ED0D988