Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 02:58:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82AA776EDAFFA26DBC277F31FE01006C5371CA047B746EA60CF30AA0C07051C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed community notes miss the point. The measured coefficient is still significant, and 0.0 would indicate no correlation, not 0.5. The scatterplot is simulated data, but a scatterplot from real data with the same r value would look comparable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782554078293233963
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 82AA776EDAFFA26DBC277F31FE01006C5371CA047B746EA60CF30AA0C07051C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1713841133451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178255407829323396382AA776EDAFFA26DBC277F31FE01006C5371CA047B746EA60CF30AA0C07051C2