Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 17:45:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8FD890ACCEE7FECEC4520F0E62CD97F8908DF0C210FB6D615394D4EF673E56F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author fails to disclose that this document is a defense motion to compel discovery (see docket below). It's written by the defense and contains their own characterizations of events. The redacted portions refer to events that would identify witness by context. https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/7996521f-5a2b-4595-98f8-32701c5234bf.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_39

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782545591102308816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8FD890ACCEE7FECEC4520F0E62CD97F8908DF0C210FB6D615394D4EF673E56F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713894337645
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782545591102308816C8FD890ACCEE7FECEC4520F0E62CD97F8908DF0C210FB6D615394D4EF673E56F