Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 03:47:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95D2A03654E104BA3AC2092D37827B427A5205A776DE11826011F671F4DE4898
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author fails to disclose that this document is a defense motion to compel discovery (see docket below). It's written by the defense and contains their own characterizations of events. The redacted portions refer to events that would identify witness by context. https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/7996521f-5a2b-4595-98f8-32701c5234bf.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_39

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782545591102308816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95D2A03654E104BA3AC2092D37827B427A5205A776DE11826011F671F4DE4898
  • createdAtMillis - 1713844075818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178254559110230881695D2A03654E104BA3AC2092D37827B427A5205A776DE11826011F671F4DE4898