Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 02:48:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author fails to disclose that this document is a defense motion to compel discovery (see docket below). It's written by the defense and contains their own characterizations of events. The redacted portions refer to events that would identify witness by context. https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/7996521f-5a2b-4595-98f8-32701c5234bf.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_39

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782545591102308816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E
  • createdAtMillis - 1713840481047
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17825455911023088166F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E