Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 18:00:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A47E1A8569ABCA0E66CB634C5416B31CE7BBCED820E7C935C3E62C1F5A800F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author fails to disclose that this document is a defense motion to compel discovery (see docket below). It's written by the defense and contains their own characterizations of events. The redacted portions refer to events that would identify witness by context. https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/7996521f-5a2b-4595-98f8-32701c5234bf.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_39

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782545591102308816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A47E1A8569ABCA0E66CB634C5416B31CE7BBCED820E7C935C3E62C1F5A800F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1713895200972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17825455911023088160A47E1A8569ABCA0E66CB634C5416B31CE7BBCED820E7C935C3E62C1F5A800F2