Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 18:27:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C137BB278BEA3F9B66BE99A881E80821ED312F5CC126610F9B88D4F4655872BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post by @DramaAlert is factually wrong. Infact, Supreme Court has held back High Court order. Culprit claimed that he inadvertently watched child Prn. Child Prs remains illegal in India under Section 14 of the POCSO Act. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/screserves-verdict-on-madras-hc-s-child-pornography-order-101713601280456.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1782467824851591231
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C137BB278BEA3F9B66BE99A881E80821ED312F5CC126610F9B88D4F4655872BB
createdAtMillis - 1713810453798
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1782467824851591231C137BB278BEA3F9B66BE99A881E80821ED312F5CC126610F9B88D4F4655872BB