Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 18:00:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68600A722419626B508042DCFA565A21E162963C97CF8BAB83892E03ED7A1A41
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post by @DramaAlert is factually wrong. Infact, Supreme Court has held back High Court order. Culprit claimed that he inadvertently watched child Prn. Child Prs remains illegal in India under Section 14 of the POCSO Act. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/screserves-verdict-on-madras-hc-s-child-pornography-order-101713601280456.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782467824851591231
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 68600A722419626B508042DCFA565A21E162963C97CF8BAB83892E03ED7A1A41
  • createdAtMillis - 1713808855492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178246782485159123168600A722419626B508042DCFA565A21E162963C97CF8BAB83892E03ED7A1A41