Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 18:52:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E861BC30FF41D5839E321284602A5773305A947527534314B7C03A3C7A696C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post by @DramaAlert is factually wrong. Infact, Supreme Court has held back High Court order. Culprit claimed that he inadvertently watched child Prn. Child Prs remains illegal in India under Section 14 of the POCSO Act. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/screserves-verdict-on-madras-hc-s-child-pornography-order-101713601280456.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782467824851591231
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E861BC30FF41D5839E321284602A5773305A947527534314B7C03A3C7A696C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1713811975128
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17824678248515912312E861BC30FF41D5839E321284602A5773305A947527534314B7C03A3C7A696C0