Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 18:32:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE82C80A079E134B91D7B9F365DC1B80AA70AA0654D66D254670F4F83C95928B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incorrect/misrepresentation. Bill C-63 has definitions for online harms, targets speech likely to incite hatred or violence and has still not passed into law. It says nothing about retroactive punishment or arbitrary house arrest. Read the current draft of the bill yourself: https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-63/first-reading

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782462866328568057
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE82C80A079E134B91D7B9F365DC1B80AA70AA0654D66D254670F4F83C95928B
  • createdAtMillis - 1713810752735
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782462866328568057FE82C80A079E134B91D7B9F365DC1B80AA70AA0654D66D254670F4F83C95928B